Δευτέρα 12 Αυγούστου 2013

U.S. Says Greek Executive Evaded Sanctions on Iran

The United States blacklisted a Greek business executive and 14 of his companies on Thursday, accusing them of conspiring with Iran to acquire eight large petroleum tankers used to transport Iranian oil to unwitting foreign customers in defiance of Western economic sanctions.

It was one of the largest efforts to evade sanctions cited by the United States concerning Iran, which is confronting an increasing array of Western economic penalties over its disputed nuclear program.

The Treasury and State Departments said in an announcement that the eight tankers, capable of carrying roughly $200 million worth of oil per shipment, are really owned by Iran and not the network of trading companies operated by the Greek executive, Dimitris Cambis.

The announcement said Mr. Cambis had established the companies to acquire the tankers for Iran, masking its identity to skirt the sanctions, which have reduced the country’s ability to export oil, a critical part of the Iranian economy.

“Today we are lifting the veil on an intricate Iranian scheme that was designed to evade international oil sanctions,” David S. Cohen, the Treasury’s under secretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, said in the announcement.

The sanctions apply to Mr. Cambis, the eight tankers and what the statement described as 14 front companies acting on behalf of the National Iranian Oil Company and the National Iranian Tanker Company. Both have already been blacklisted.

Under American sanctions laws, blacklisted people and entities are generally prohibited from engaging in any transactions with Americans, and any assets they may have under United States jurisdiction are frozen.

“We will continue to expose deceptive Iranian practices, and to sanction those individuals and entities who participate in these schemes,” Mr. Cohen said.

Iran’s state news media made no mention of the announcement, and attempts to reach Mr. Cambis for comment were not immediately successful.

Last month, when news reports implicating him first surfaced, he denied such a collaboration with Iran.

Reuters reported on Feb. 26 that Mr. Cambis had spent about $204 million in 2012 to acquire the tankers, and that Iranian tankers had transferred their oil to these vessels on the high seas. These so-called ship-to-ship or S.T.S. transfers are difficult to monitor.

Mr. Cambis was quoted by Reuters as saying that the tankers were for a venture managed from the United Arab Emirates, and that “there is no Iranian vessel that has done any S.T.S. with us.”

Two senior American officials who briefed reporters about the sanctions said they had ample evidence to justify the action taken against Mr. Cambis, describing his activities as part of a wider effort by Iran to evade the sanctions.

“We are confident in our information,” said one official, who spoke on the condition that they not be further identified.

The announcement came a day after the International Energy Agency, a 28-nation group of oil importers, said in a widely watched survey that Iran’s oil exports rose in February, despite the imposition of new American sanctions intended to further limit the country’s ability to sell oil. The officials said it was unclear whether the eight tankers identified in Thursday’s announcement were partly responsible for the increase in the Iranian exports. They also declined to specify the intended customers of the oil. But they acknowledged that the tankers carried a significant quantity.

“That’s why we’re glad we put an end to this way of evading sanctions,” one official said.

Δευτέρα 27 Μαΐου 2013

U.S. Sanctions Greek Businessman for Helping Iran Ship Oil


The U.S. Treasury Department imposed sanctions on a Greek businessman, saying he helpedIran evade sanctions by purchasing oil tankers and disguising their cargoes.
Dimitris Cambis, president of Impire Shipping Ltd., will have his assets in the U.S. blocked, the Treasury said in a statement today. Cambis used Impire Shipping and other front companies to buy eight tankers capable of carrying $200 million- worth of oil per shipment and use them to load Iranian crude from the country’s own ships, the department said.
A file photo shows a ship docked at the Lavan oil refinery quay on Lavan Island, Iran during May 2004. The U.S. and allies are trying to curb Iran’s oil exports, the country’s largest source of revenue, to pressure the government in Tehran to stop enriching uranium. Photographer: Behrouz Mehri/AFP via Getty Images
“These are very bad rumors created by our competitors because we are trying to take market share and they don’t like it,” Cambis said by phone from his office in Athens. He said he was unaware of the sanctions against him.
The U.S. and allies are trying to curb Iran’s oil exports, the country’s largest source of revenue, to pressure the government in Tehran to stop enriching uranium. Negotiators will meet in Kazakhstan next month to discuss steps toward an agreement on Iran’s nuclear program, which the country says is for civilian use while Western leaders suspect military intent.
“Today we are lifting the veil on an intricate Iranian scheme that was designed to evade international oil sanctions,” David Cohen, Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, said in the statement. “We will continue to expose deceptive Iranian practices, and to sanction those individuals and entities who participate in these schemes.”

Libra Shipping

Impire and a management company called Libra Shipping loaded the tankers using ship-to-ship transfers to mask the cargoes’ origin and sell them on the global market, the department said. In December 2012, Impire and the National Iranian Tanker Company, known as NITC, completed a transfer of Iranian oil off Khor Fakkan in the United Arab Emirates, according to the statement. The Treasury has named 58 vessels as blocked property for ties to NITC, it said.
Iranian oil shipments advanced 13 percent last month even as the U.S. implemented new sanctions against the Persian Gulf country, according to the International Energy Agency. Exports are still down from an average of 1.5 million barrels a day last year and 2.5 million in 2011, before sanctions intensified, IEA estimates show. Net oil revenue dropped to $64 billion for the first 11 months of 2012, compared with $95 billion for all of 2011, the U.S. Department of Energy said in a Dec. 21 report.
There was no answer at the phone number for Libra Shipping’s office in Glyfada, Greece, outside of normal business hours today. An e-mail to the company seeking comment wasn’t immediately answered.
To contact the reporter on this story: Isaac Arnsdorf in London at iarnsdorf@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Alaric Nightingale at anightingal1@bloomberg.net

Analysis: Iran economy far from collapse as sanctions tighten



(Reuters) - Hossein Ahmad, an Iranian who runs a jewelry shop in wealthy Dubai, marvels at the spending power he sees on show during his monthly trips to Tehran, a year after U.S. sanctions largely froze Iran out of the global banking system.
Shops in the Iranian capital are crowded. Finding a seat at goodrestaurants can be difficult. And the ski resorts in the mountains north of Tehran continue to attract Tehran's glamorous and well-heeled.
"The economy has problems with the sanctions, yes. But it's still working," he says. "It isn't as bad as people outside the country think."
Sanctions are clearly having an impact; the country's oil revenue has been slashed and other trade disrupted; a weak currency has sent the prices of some imports soaring, destroying jobs as some factories using imported parts have folded.
But they are not close to having the "crippling" effect envisaged by Washington. The Iranian government has found ways to soften the impact, and Iran's economy is large and diverse enough to absorb a lot of punishment.
So at talks next week with the world's major powers in Almaty, Kazakhstan, Iran seems unlikely to feel under overwhelming pressure to back down on its disputed nuclear program, which the West suspects is a cover to make weapons.
"The government had a long time to prepare for economic war," said Mohammad Ali Shabani, an Iranian political analyst based in London. "If you're talking about collapse, that is not happening."
FOREIGN RESERVES
Iran's oil and gas exports, which previously accounted for three-quarters of total exports, plunged last year because of international sanctions, and they may fall further as Washington makes it even harder for Tehran to obtain payment for them.
The International Energy Agency estimated last week that Iran's oil exports may have dropped below 1 million barrels per day in January from 2.2 million bpd in late 2011, costing the country over $40 billion in lost revenues last year.
That loss is manageable, however, for a nearly $500 billion economy, and Iran has taken steps in the past year to put the economy on an emergency footing, partially offsetting the drop in inflows of wealth with a reduction of outflows.
Imports of luxury goods including foreign cars and mobile phones were banned, state media said, while the government cut subsidies for students studying abroad. Gold exports were controlled to make capital flight from the country harder.
Most importantly, the government presided late last year over a slide in the Iranian rial, which lost about two-thirds of its value against the U.S. dollar in the free market before stabilizing in its current range around 36,500.
It is not clear whether authorities deliberately engineered the slide, which caused panic among businessmen and brief street protests in Tehran, but the end result suits a government that is hunkering down to resist more years of sanctions.
Since the state controls the oil sector, it can divert most of Iran's remaining hard currency supplies where it wishes. It is using special exchange centers to sell dollars at cheap rates to importers of basic foods, medicines and other essentials.
Meanwhile, the mass of Iranians who want dollars for other purposes - to import luxuries, travel overseas or move their savings abroad - must buy them at the expensive market rate. This cuts demand to send money out of the country.
The outcome, analysts say, is that Iran may avoid an external payments crisis even if oil exports fall further. Its foreign reserves are estimated by private economists to have dropped to around $70-80 billion from just above $100 billion at the end of 2011; the fall may slow and eventually halt as the currency depreciation and other emergency policies take hold.
Iranian-born economist Mehrdad Emadi, of the Betamatrix consultancy in London, said statements by officials in Iran suggested they had identified $60 billion as a safe minimum level for reserves, and would take further steps to restrain imports if necessary to protect that level.
"We are not even in the neighborhood of a critical situation for the balance of payments," he said.
Oil used to provide about two-thirds of government revenues, so the sanctions have hit state finances hard. But once again, the weak rial has come to the government's aid, letting it make money by selling some of its petrodollars to the private sector at much higher prices than a year ago.
The International Monetary Fund estimated in October that Iran would post a general state budget deficit of 3.9 percent of gross domestic product this year - easily bearable for a government with gross debt of only about 9 percent of GDP.
LIVING STANDARDS
The sanctions are, however, sapping Iranians' living standards as the weak rial pushes up inflation through higher import costs. Chicken prices, for example, nearly tripled in a year as the cost of buying feed from abroad jumped.
The official inflation rate hit 27.4 percent at the end of 2012. Including imported goods, actual inflation is believed to be roughly twice as high. A small jar of Nescafe now costs about 230,000 rials ($6.30 at the free market rate) in a Tehran store, up from 120,000 rials a few months ago.
Higher import costs, as well as inefficient management, have made it hard to obtain some medicines. Hospitals have reported shortages of drugs to treat cancer, diabetes and other diseases.
The auto sector, which built over 1.6 million vehicles in 2010, has been devastated by more expensive imported parts. Output roughly halved in the past year, and thousands of people lost their jobs as some parts plants closed, local media said.
But the picture is more nuanced. Some companies such as home appliance makers, which were being undercut by cheap imports, are now growing strongly because the rial's drop has made them more competitive, Shabani said.
Iranians seeking to escape inflation and unable to move their money out of the country are building new homes, boosting the construction and carpentry industries.
These mini-booms are reflected in flashy new cars cruising Tehran's streets and luxury apartments going up in its affluent neighborhoods. The stock market hit a record high this week.
Emadi estimated that while some of Iran's top industrial centers could hemorrhage jobs because of the sagging oil and auto industries, overall the economy was unlikely to shrink more than around 2 or 3 percent this year.
Meanwhile, government subsidies and handouts are expected to continue softening the impact of inflation on Iran's poorer families by keeping staple foods such as bread, rice, sugar and edible oil affordable for them. Parliament agreed last month to allocate a further $2 billion to support low-income families.
The rial's depreciation has halved the savings of the middle class and destroyed some of their businesses, but "those at the top and bottom of the pyramid haven't seen a dramatic amount of change", said Emad Mostaque, a strategist who follows Iran at London-based NOAH CapitalMarkets.
This uneven distribution of the pain of sanctions is why, for Washington, they could prove counter-productive: they are doing most damage to a group that might be expected to push for political change in Iran.
"The middle class, people with fixed incomes, pensioners are under a lot of pressure. They are too exhausted to rise up," Shabani said.

(Additional reporting by Zahra Hosseinian; Editing by Will Waterman)

Iran Slams Western 'Interference' In Election Process


Iranian media are reporting that Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi has criticized the United States and France for their comments about the vetting of would-be candidates in the country's June 14 presidential election. In remarks published on May 26, Salehi said Western officials should not make "unjustified comments" that amount to "interference" in Iran's internal affairs. On May 21, the unelected Guardians Council approved only eight of 686 would-be candidates seeking to run in the election to choose a successor to President Mahmud Ahmadinejad, who is completing his second term and is ineligible to run again. Afterward, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry criticized the "lack of transparency" in the vetting process, while French Foreign Ministry spokesman Phillipe Lelliot urged Iranian authorities to let the Iranian people choose their own leaders. Based on reporting by AFP and Far

Πέμπτη 3 Ιανουαρίου 2013

Ιράν: Οι πύραυλοι Πάτριοτ στηνΤουρκία «θα προκαλέσουν παγκόσμιο πόλεμο»


Φωτογραφία για Ιράν: Οι πύραυλοι Πάτριοτ στηνΤουρκία «θα προκαλέσουν παγκόσμιο πόλεμο»
Η σχεδιασθείσα από το ΝΑΤΟ ανάπτυξη πυραύλων Πάτριοτ στη μεθόριο Τουρκίας-Συρίας μπορεί να οδηγήσει σε «παγκόσμιο πόλεμο» στον οποίο θα εμπλακεί η Ευρώπη, δήλωσε σήμερα ο επικεφαλής των ιρανικών ενόπλων δυνάμεων. Τον Νοέμβριο, η Τουρκία ζήτησε από το ΝΑΤΟ την ανάπτυξη του πυραυλικού συστήματος Πάτριοτ με στόχο την αναχαίτιση αεροσκαφών ή πυραύλων ύστερα από τις συνομιλίες με θέμα την εξεύρεση τρόπων για την ενίσχυση της συνοριακής ασφάλειας μετά τα επανειλημμένα επεισόδια με πυρά προερχόμενα από τη Συρία σε τουρκικό έδαφος.

«Ο καθένας από αυτούς τους Πάτριοτ είναι μία μαύρη κηλίδα στον παγκόσμιο χάρτη και προορίζεται για την πρόκληση παγκοσμίου πολέμου. Σχεδιάζουν έναν παγκόσμιο πόλεμο και αυτό είναι πολύ επικίνδυνο για το μέλλον της ανθρωπότητας και το μέλλον της ίδιας της Ευρώπης» δήλωσε, σύμφωνα με το Ιρανικό Φοιτητικό Πρακτορείο Ειδήσεων, ο επικεφαλής των ενόπλων δυνάμεων στρατηγός Χάσαν Φιρουζαμπαντί.

Πηγή: ΑΠΕ-ΜΠΕ

Οι γυναίκες νίντζα από το Ιράν



Φωτογραφία για Οι γυναίκες νίντζα από το Ιράν
Οι Ιρανοί το έχουν δει αρκεατά σοβαρά. Προπονούν 3,000 γυναίκες νίντζα για να υπερασπιστούν την πατρίδα όταν θα καταστεί αναγκαίο. Δεκάδες μαυροντυμένες γυναίκες νίντζα , των οποίων οι ηλικίες κυμαίνονται από 5 έως 56 , εκπαιδεύονται ως θανατηφόρες νίντζα σε ένα σχολείο στην Τεχεράνη. ΄΄Έχουμε εκπαιδεύσει τις γυναίκες να έχουν την δύναμη και την ικανότητα , να κάνουν ότι είναι δυνατόν να προστατεύσουν την πατρίδα΄΄ , δήλωσε ο Akbar Faraji , ο οποίος διευθύνει το σχολείο.
ΦΩΤΟΓΡΑΦΙΕΣ

US Recognizes Unelected Terrorists as Syrian "Representatives"

As expected, after a long pause of feigned "consideration," the US has recognized the militants it has been arming, funding, aiding logistically and supporting diplomatically since as early as 2007, as the "legitimate representatives of the Syrian people," with the added caveat, "in opposition to the Assad regime." The Wall Street Journal would report that US President Barack Obama’s announcement actually read:
"The Syrian National Coalition for Revolutionary and Opposition Forces is reflective and representative enough of the Syrian population that we consider them the legitimate representative of the Syrian people in opposition to the Assad regime."
The bizarre, uncertain wording sends a message of both uncertainty and resounding illegitimacy, indicating that the US itself recognizes the true nature of the so-called "Syrian" opposition is apparent to an increasing number of people both in public office and across the public, and that a certain degree of rhetorical distance must be kept.
The overt, extremist nature of the militants operating in Syria has become increasingly difficult for the West to paper over. Torrents of videos and confirmed reports documenting militant atrocities, including several involving the machine gunning of bound prisoners, and a particularly gruesome video of a child handed a sword by militants to hack off the heads of bound men wearing civilian clothing, has confirmed the worst fears expressed by geopolitical analysts and foreign governments around the world – that the Syrian opposition is in fact Al Qaeda.
So damning is the evidence, that President Obama was forced to finally acknowledge this, stating:
There is a small element of those who oppose the Assad regime that are affiliated with al Qaeda in Iraq, and we are going to make clear to distinguish between those elements of the opposition.
The Wall Street Journal, in their article, "U.S. Recognizes Syria’s Main Rebel Group," would also report:
The Obama administration on Tuesday for the first time released intelligence directly tying a powerful Syrian rebel group to commanders of al Qaeda in Iraq. U.S. officials formally sanctioned the Syrian militia, called Jabhat al-Nusra - freezing any assets it may have in the U.S. and barring Americans from doing business with it - because of fears it is gaining disproportionate power among the rebel groups seeking to overthrow Mr. Assad.
Despite this announcement, such sanctions are symbolic and selectively enforced. Also on such lists was theMujahedeen e-Khalq (MEK), and currently the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), which officially merged with Al Qaeda in 2007, according to the US Army’s West Point Combating Terrorism Center (CTC) report, "Al-Qa'ida's Foreign Fighters in Iraq." Yet in 2011, NATO had armed, funded, and provided air support for LIFG during the premeditated overthrow of the Libyan government.
US Has Knowingly Supported Al Qaeda for Years
Based in Benghazi, elements of LIFG were behind the attack on a US consulate and the death of US Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. They are also confirmed to be sending fighters and weapons through NATO-member Turkey where they stage before engaging in combat operations inside Syria.
In November 2011, the Telegraph in their article, "Leading Libyan Islamist met Free Syrian Army opposition group," would mention LIFG by name when they reported:
Abdulhakim Belhadj, head of the Tripoli Military Council and the former leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, "met with Free Syrian Army leaders in Istanbul and on the border with Turkey," said a military official working with Mr Belhadj. "Mustafa Abdul Jalil (the interim Libyan president) sent him there."
Another Telegraph article, "Libya’s new rulers offer weapons to Syrian rebels," would admit:
Syrian rebels held secret talks with Libya's new authorities on Friday, aiming to secure weapons and money for their insurgency against President Bashar al-Assad’s regime, The Daily Telegraph has learned.
At the meeting, which was held in Istanbul and included Turkish officials, the Syrians requested "assistance" from the Libyan representatives and were offered arms, and potentially volunteers. "There is something being planned to send weapons and even Libyan fighters to Syria," said a Libyan source, speaking on condition of anonymity. "There is a military intervention on the way. Within a few weeks you will see." Later that month, some 600 Libyan terrorists would be reported to have entered Syria to begin combat operations and have been flooding into the country ever since.
Clearly they are not "secretly" organizing hundreds of fighters under the nose of the US consulate in Benghazi, Libya, and "sneaking" through NATO member states into Syria. They are doing with NATO-backing, with NATOadmittedly providing support for militants along Turkey’s border with Syria, utilizing the very same regional Al Qaeda networks identified by the US military during the US occupation of Iraq – which also explains where Jabhat al-Nusra is coming from.
Further undermining US claims that they have identified and are attempting to separate from the "opposition," sectarian extremists, are admissions made as early as 2007 that US foreign policy explicitly sought to utilize these very sectarian extremists to violently overthrow the Syrian government. Indeed, in 2007, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh published an article titled, "The Redirection" for the New Yorker, within which US, Saudi, and Lebanese officials described their conspiracy.
In the report it specifically stated:
"To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has coöperated with Saudi Arabia's government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda." -The Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007)
Hersh's report would continue by stating:
"the Saudi government, with Washington's approval, would provide funds and logistical aid to weaken the government of President Bashir Assad, of Syria. The Israelis believe that putting such pressure on the Assad government will make it more conciliatory and open to negotiations." -The Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007)
The link between extremist groups and Saudi funding was also mentioned in the report, and reflects evidence presented by the West Point CTC indicating that the majority of fighters and funding behind the sectarian violence in Iraq, came from Saudi Arabia. Hersh’s report specifically states:
" [Saudi Arabia's] Bandar and other Saudis have assured the White House that "they will keep a very close eye on the religious fundamentalists. Their message to us was 'We've created this movement, and we can control it.' It's not that we don't want the Salafis to throw bombs; it's whothey throw them at - Hezbollah, Moqtada al-Sadr, Iran, and at the Syrians, if they continue to work with Hezbollah and Iran." -The Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007)
The report reads like a prophecy, fulfilled verbatim during the events of the last 2 years. The Wall Street Journal report openly states that the Syrian conflict is turning into a proxy war with Iran, just as was planned in 2007. The feigned ignorance, surprise and attempts to mitigate terror groups the US purposefully created in the first place, is merely for public consumption. Bands of sectarian extremists destroying Syria was the stated plan for years, a plan now coming into fruition.
Wall Street Journal Admits Syria’s Minorities are Fighting for Lives – SNC Leader Admits He Seeks an "Islamic State"
And even as US President Obama attempts to assure the public and the international community that the West is sorting out the extremists, the Wall Street Journal admits that militias are forming across Syria – assembled by Syria's large minorities to protect themselves from what is clearly a sectarian assault – not a pro-democracy movement. In describing the militias, the Wall Street Journal reports:
Many come from Syria's religious minorities, mostly the Shiite offshoot Alawite sect to which the president’s family belongs, as well Christians and Druze, who increasingly see themselves in a battle against a mainly Sunni rebel insurgency.
Of course, the Wall Street Journal attempts to portray the militias as mercenaries in the service of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, despite admitting the sectarian nature of the opposition and admitting that Al Qaeda is confirmed to be operating inside of Syria.
The sectarian nature of the bloodbath the US was engineering in 2007 was also mentioned in Seymour Hersh’s "The Redirection." Foreshadowing was given by a former CIA officer based in Lebanon who stated:
"Robert Baer, a former longtime C.I.A. agent in Lebanon, has been a severe critic of Hezbollah and has warned of its links to Iranian-sponsored terrorism. But now, he told me, "we've got Sunni Arabs preparing for cataclysmic conflict, and we will need somebody to protect the Christians in Lebanon. It used to be the French and the United States who would do it, and now it’s going to be Nasrallah and the Shiites" -The Redirection, Seymour Hersh (2007) Clearly, the Christians in Syria would also need protection.
And while the US attempts to reassure the world that the brood of terrorists it is cultivating and has now officially recognized as the "representatives of the Syrian people" is "pro-democratic" in nature, the very leader the US recently handpicked in Doha, Qatar to lead the new opposition coalition, Moaz al-Khatib, has admitted in an Al Jazeera interview that he seeks to establish an "Islamic state" across currently secular Syria.
Modeled after the increasingly despotic Muslim Brotherhood regime led by Mohammed Morsi, who is currentlyhiring rape gangs to help disperse protesters opposed to his expanding dictatorship, al-Khatib's vision of Syria’s future is one even many Syrian Sunnis reject.
To declare this violent minority, augmented by foreign terrorists couching the establishment of a brutal faux-theocracy behind the paper-thin veneer of "democracy," as the "representatives of the Syrian people" is not a "a big step" as President Obama declared. Instead, it is a step as illegitimate and morally bankrupt as it is desperate. It is a stumble forward – and one that threatens to trip up anyone within arms reach of America as it takes it.
Tony Cartalucci is the writer and editor at Land Destroyer